|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 15, 2014 20:23:22 GMT
So, I just thought of making this thread so we can talk about how a human, bare-handed, would do against different dinosaurs, and the effects of certain attacks on humans. As the rules encourage us, we should try being very accurate and showing calculations for our assumptions.
|
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 15, 2014 23:57:56 GMT
Can we use multiple humans against larger dinosaurs?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 0:00:49 GMT
Whatever you feel like. Have you ever thought of a man getting hit by a Spinosaurus aegyptiacus?  The large, heavy and muscular arm would generate a lot of kinetic energy, which I believe would easily knock someone to the ground. |
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 16, 2014 0:06:01 GMT
It would probably break most of the human's bones with enough impact force.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 0:07:40 GMT
A hit to the chest would cause severe damage. The claws probably wouldn't do much, seeing as they are proper for grappling, not gutting. It would surely cause internal bleeding.
|
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 16, 2014 0:28:24 GMT
The claws would also do severe damage, keep in mind they are traveling at exactly the same speed as the arm which is full of kinetic energy. The claws were curved and designed for grappling, but they were easily capable of impaling tissue/flesh/muscle/internal and external organs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 0:33:25 GMT
They weren't sharp though, they were rather blunt. Either way, it would cause a lot of damage. A bite the the chest would crush lots of bones and damage the lungs, for sure, and it would be quite clearly lethal.
|
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 16, 2014 0:41:19 GMT
They weren't sharp though, they were rather blunt. Either way, it would cause a lot of damage. A bite the the chest would crush lots of bones and damage the lungs, for sure, and it would be quite clearly lethal. A bite to the chest from a Spinosaurus would be pretty much an instant death for a human, many of the important arteries and organs will be damaged severely (including the heart) and the chest bone and ribcage would just shatter from the sheer force. |
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 1:01:35 GMT
Yes, the sternum and the rubcage would both shatter. Eduardo Aramayo Lasaga has a record of standing over 1.5 tons on his chest for 7 seconds or something, and that could have been deadly. He practices though, and that's just an example; Spinosaurus aegyptiacus has a guesstimated biteforce of ~3 tonnes, which is twice that. It's also a larger PSI force, since the area is smaller. Moreover, there's also teeth, and I must mention that Eduardo has a technique to maintain his blood pressure under control. And that's for an object placed over his chest, not for a bite with supposedly twice the force. The sternum and the ribcage would shatter and the lung would get damaged, and so would the heart.
|
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 16, 2014 8:23:46 GMT
Yes, the sternum and the rubcage would both shatter. Eduardo Aramayo Lasaga has a record of standing over 1.5 tons on his chest for 7 seconds or something, and that could have been deadly. He practices though, and that's just an example; Spinosaurus aegyptiacus has a guesstimated biteforce of ~3 tonnes, which is twice that. It's also a larger PSI force, since the area is smaller. Moreover, there's also teeth, and I must mention that Eduardo has a technique to maintain his blood pressure under control. And that's for an object placed over his chest, not for a bite with supposedly twice the force. The sternum and the ribcage would shatter and the lung would get damaged, and so would the heart. Yea. |
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 12:07:07 GMT
Not that we have evidence of this behaviour (and that's why don't support it), but I also wonder the effects of a Spinosaurus aegyptiacus' headbutt on a human. My guess is that it wouldn't be able to build up too much speed, but it would knock the human to the ground.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesporerex on Feb 16, 2014 15:02:37 GMT
We actually have no evidence of the giant claw of Spinosaurus, its just a theory based on its relatives
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 15:04:22 GMT
I know, and since it is based on its relatives, it is more likely to be true than false.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesporerex on Feb 16, 2014 19:52:37 GMT
yes, obviously
|
|
|
|
Post by rexog90 on Mar 1, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
Bare-handed? Well, a Velociraptor Mongoliensis would be a fair opponent for a medium-sized human, it was small but fast and had very dangerous claws, but it had a fragile anatomy, it could be easily killed with a baseball bat, and maybe a strong kick would defeat it.
|
|
<- imma rek u btichs