|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 16:04:02 GMT
Post your size comparisons here and debate about them. As usual, try using sources.
PS.: This is for both extant and extinct animals, as well as comparisons between two or more species.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 16:09:47 GMT
  Not to scale: Bistahieversor sealeyi and Skorpiovenator bustingorryi skulls compared. |
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 22:20:35 GMT
 FMNH PR2081 compared to Alamosaurus sanjuanensis. |
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 16, 2014 22:34:44 GMT
Tyrannosaurus and Diplodocus (undefined specimens)  The Tyrannosaurus in the image appears to have a too high leg:body ratio if it is representing Sue, but overall the skeletal diagram appears to be pretty accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Feb 16, 2014 22:37:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 16, 2014 23:43:15 GMT
It does look different, but it still looks like FMNH PR2081. And yes, it's pretty accurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesporerex on Feb 19, 2014 17:26:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thesporerex on Feb 19, 2014 17:27:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 19, 2014 22:55:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thesporerex on Feb 20, 2014 10:38:20 GMT
That is pretty much correct from what I saw at the natural history museum hall of mammals lol |
|
|
|
Post by Hatzegopteryx on Feb 20, 2014 17:21:25 GMT
Yeah, it's a pretty good comparison.
|
|
<- imma rek u btichs